Apr. 3rd, 2024

anghraine: tarrlok glowering through his hair; text: lost (tarrlok [lost])
The relief I felt at checking my uni email and having no emails directed personally to me was so vast that even I feel it’s ridiculous.

I mean, I do have things to be somewhat stressed about, but it’s like I went from “oh my God, my heart’s going to stop as soon as I click” to a massive weight falling off my chest and shoulders.

Now all I have to do is work myself up to the phone call to set up a follow-up appointment with the psychiatrist about … uh, anxiety.

Tagged: #i exist in two forms: no fucks given and this is how i die #it's sometimes productive but mostly not fun
anghraine: rows of old-fashioned books lining shelves (books)
moggett responded to this post:

It also seems to utterly ignore how Elizabeth is also supposed to be overcoming her initial incorrect first impression of Darcy. It’s not like Elizabeth is perfect in the text while Darcy changes…

I replied:

Oh, definitely. With fandom, to be fair, you get a mix of that and more balanced takes, but I think academia generally (though not always) tends to resist the equality between them forwarded by P&P’s structure and dynamics.

I think it’s partly because P&P does a really good job of inviting readers to participate in Elizabeth’s perceptions and mistakes while leaving open the possibility of doing otherwise, which is especially uncomfortable for academics of a certain type (who are often not great at accepting being wrong), and all the more so for ones who can’t bring themselves to complicate their initial judgment of Elizabeth as the only truly right-thinking character.

It’s an old piece, but I remember reading an essay about how Darcy’s letter hijacks readerly sympathies that should continue to belong with Elizabeth to the point of provoking resentment from readers. I don’t think it actually does that for most readers (Darcy has always been popular, as Austen intended; when she was worrying about what her beloved niece would think of P&P, Austen wrote, "Her liking Darcy and Eliz[abe]th is enough. She might hate all the others if she would"). But it does have that effect for some people who are often prone to these academic approaches. But it’s—the evidence that Elizabeth’s judgments are skewed by her vanity is pretty copious by the time that Darcy proposes, if you’re willing to see it, and unwillingness to see it or give it ethical weight even upon re-reading is, I think, basically an unwillingness to engage with the novel on its own terms.

Tagged: #/rambles #i genuinely think a lot of academia handwringing over pride and prejudice comes from being unable to accept being wrong #with a side of hugely prioritizing theory to the point of neglecting the details of the text #i don't mean subtle detail either ... it's more of what strier was talking about imo

A rec!

Apr. 3rd, 2024 06:57 pm
anghraine: a stock photo of a book with a leaf on it (book with leaf)
I took a break from the dissertation to watch Princess Weekes's nearly hour-long video on SF/F and white saviorism. It's very good IMO. I shouldn't have read the comments, which include a lot of "well actually Paul Atreides is a criticism of white saviors, how dare" responses that are predictable and generic enough to have been produced by a dedicated bot farm (especially considering that she directly addresses Herbert's attempts to criticize the trope, at some length) & various ASOIAF/Daenerys stans who also ignore the more complex argument that Princess Weekes makes in the video itself.

I have really liked some of Princess Weekes's other videos, though she can be a bit hit or miss for me in general—she doesn't always give herself the space or time to get into finer details/relevant points of a potentially complicated argument (e.g., I liked her video on imperialism in cartoons like Steven Universe and She-Ra and the Princesses of Power, but found it rather odd to talk about SPOP's depiction of imperialism without discussing the First Ones at all, esp given her argument about the levels of metaphor in the depiction of the greater Horde). But she gives herself the space she needs for this one and there's clearly a lot of research and nuanced thinking that went into it.

I've been interested for a long time in the way in which Daenerys, for instance, both is and is not racialized (in terms of her ethnicity/her cultural upbringing/her associations through conquest/the extremely white coding around the Targaryens) and it was really fascinating to see someone discuss that beyond snappy sound bites. I also thought she made a really intriguing point about the failures of subversion wrt white savior aesthetics, or even subtler complications of the narrative than outright subversion. The white savior aesthetic is the point for many fans and, regardless of the ultimate purpose of using a white savior aesthetic, deploying it gives a significant portion of the audience what they're after and they'll simply tune out the rest. (This seems akin to the old question of whether it's possible to successfully convey an anti-war theme via war films.) I also thought the connection with Haggard's Ayesha was an interesting insight; I read She in a sci-fi class during my PhD and was struck by how powerfully racist it was (even including the ever-fun "modern Greeks aren't really Greek because they're racially impure"), but I wouldn't have associated Ayesha with Daenerys.

Anyway! It was intriguing and quite good, I thought.

Profile

anghraine: vader extending his lightsaber; text: and now for the airing of grievances! (Default)
Anghraine

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12345 67
891011121314
15 1617 18 192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 12:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »